Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Página inicial / Early Christian Art Rejected Natural Space to Suggest the Supernatural

Early Christian Art Rejected Natural Space to Suggest the Supernatural

Postar um comentário

Supposed phenomena not subject to the laws of nature

This article is well-nigh unexplained or non-natural forces and phenomena. For other uses, see Supernatural (disambiguation).

"Supernatural power" redirects here. For the popular culture concept of the imaginary superhuman abilities, come across Superpower (ability).

The supernatural is phenomena or entities that are non subject field to the laws of nature. It is derived from Medieval Latin supernaturalis, from Latin super- (in a higher place, beyond, or outside of) + natura (nature)[1] Though the corollary term "nature", has had multiple meanings since the aboriginal globe, the term "supernatural" emerged in the medieval menstruum[ii] and did not exist in the ancient world.[three]

The supernatural is featured in folklore and religious contexts,[4] merely can besides feature as an explanation in more secular contexts, as in the cases of superstitions or belief in the paranormal.[5] The term is attributed to non-physical entities, such as angels, demons, gods, and spirits. It likewise includes claimed abilities embodied in or provided past such beings, including magic, telekinesis, levitation, precognition, and extrasensory perception.

The philosophy of naturalism contends that goose egg exists beyond the natural world, and equally such approaches supernatural claims with skepticism.[six]

Etymology and history of the concept [edit]

Occurring equally both an adjective and a noun, descendants of the modern English compound supernatural enter the language from two sources: via Centre French (supernaturel) and direct from the Centre French'south term'southward antecedent, post-Classical Latin (supernaturalis). Post-classical Latin supernaturalis first occurs in the 6th century, equanimous of the Latin prefix super- and nātūrālis (meet nature). The earliest known advent of the give-and-take in the English occurs in a Middle English translation of Catherine of Siena's Dialogue (orcherd of Syon, effectually 1425; Þei haue not þanne þe supernaturel lyȝt ne þe liȝt of kunnynge, bycause þei vndirstoden information technology not).[7]

The semantic value of the term has shifted over the history of its use. Originally the term referred exclusively to Christian understandings of the world. For example, as an adjective, the term can mean "belonging to a realm or organisation that transcends nature, as that of divine, magical, or ghostly beings; attributed to or idea to reveal some strength across scientific understanding or the laws of nature; occult, paranormal" or "more than what is natural or ordinary; unnaturally or extraordinarily groovy; abnormal, extraordinary". Obsolete uses include "of, relating to, or dealing with metaphysics". As a noun, the term can mean "a supernatural being", with a particularly potent history of employment in relation to entities from the mythologies of the ethnic peoples of the Americas.[7]

History of the concept [edit]

The ancient earth had no word that resembled "supernatural".[three] Dialogues from Neoplatonic philosophy in the 3rd century AD contributed the development of the concept the supernatural via Christian theology in later centuries.[8] The term nature had existed since artifact with Latin authors like Augustine using the word and its cognates at least 600 times in Metropolis of God. In the medieval period, "nature" had 10 different meanings and "natural" had eleven dissimilar meanings.[2] Peter Lombard, a medieval scholastic in the 12th century, asked about causes that are beyond nature, in that how there could be causes that were God'due south solitary. He used the term praeter naturam in his writings.[ii] In the scholastic menses, Thomas Aquinas classified miracles into three categories: "above nature", "beyond nature", and "against nature". In doing so, he sharpened the distinction between nature and miracles more the early Church Fathers had done.[2] As a effect, he had created a dichotomy of sorts of the natural and supernatural.[8] Though the phrase "supra naturam" was used since the 4th century Advertisement, it was in the 1200s that Thomas Aquinas used the term "supernaturalis" and despite this, the term had to expect until the end of the medieval menses before it became more popularly used.[2] The discussions on "nature" from the scholastic menstruation were diverse and unsettled with some postulating that fifty-fifty miracles are natural and that natural magic was a natural part of the globe.[two]

Epistemology and metaphysics [edit]

The metaphysical considerations of the existence of the supernatural tin can be difficult to approach as an practice in philosophy or theology because whatsoever dependencies on its antithesis, the natural, will ultimately have to be inverted or rejected. I complicating gene is that in that location is disagreement about the definition of "natural" and the limits of naturalism. Concepts in the supernatural domain are closely related to concepts in religious spirituality and occultism or spiritualism.

For sometimes we utilise the word nature for that Author of nature whom the schoolmen, harshly plenty, phone call natura naturans, every bit when it is said that nature hath made human partly corporeal and partly immaterial. Sometimes nosotros mean by the nature of a thing the essence, or that which the schoolmen scruple non to phone call the quiddity of a thing, namely, the attribute or attributes on whose score information technology is what it is, whether the matter exist corporeal or not, every bit when we endeavor to ascertain the nature of an angle, or of a triangle, or of a fluid body, as such. Sometimes we take nature for an internal principle of motion, equally when we say that a stone let autumn in the air is by nature carried towards the centre of the world, and, on the contrary, that fire or flame does naturally move upwardly toward firmament. Sometimes nosotros understand by nature the established course of things, as when we say that nature makes the dark succeed the day, nature hath fabricated respiration necessary to the life of men. Sometimes we take nature for an aggregate of powers belonging to a torso, especially a living one, every bit when physicians say that nature is strong or weak or spent, or that in such or such diseases nature left to herself will do the cure. Sometimes nosotros take nature for the universe, or arrangement of the corporeal works of God, as when information technology is said of a phoenix, or a chimera, that there is no such thing in nature, i.e. in the world. And sometimes too, and that about usually, we would limited by nature a semi-deity or other foreign kind of being, such as this soapbox examines the notion of.

And besides these more absolute acceptions, if I may and so call them, of the word nature, it has divers others (more relative), every bit nature is wont to be prepare or in opposition or contradistinction to other things, every bit when we say of a stone when it falls downwards that it does it by a natural motility, simply that if it be thrown upwards its motion that fashion is violent. And then chemists distinguish vitriol into natural and fictitious, or made past art, i.east. by the intervention of homo ability or skill; so it is said that water, kept suspended in a sucking pump, is non in its natural place, every bit that is which is stagnant in the well. We say besides that wicked men are still in the country of nature, but the regenerate in a country of grace; that cures wrought by medicines are natural operations; but the miraculous ones wrought by Christ and his apostles were supernatural.[9]

—Robert Boyle, A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature

Nomological possibility is possibility under the actual laws of nature. Most philosophers since David Hume have held that the laws of nature are metaphysically contingent—that there could have been dissimilar natural laws than the ones that actually obtain. If and then, then it would non be logically or metaphysically impossible, for example, for yous to travel to Alpha Centauri in one twenty-four hour period; it would just have to be the case that yous could travel faster than the speed of lite. But of grade there is an important sense in which this is not nomologically possible; given that the laws of nature are what they are. In the philosophy of natural science, impossibility assertions come up to be widely accepted every bit overwhelmingly probable rather than considered proved to the bespeak of being unchallengeable. The basis for this strong acceptance is a combination of extensive evidence of something non occurring, combined with an underlying scientific theory, very successful in making predictions, whose assumptions pb logically to the conclusion that something is impossible. While an impossibility assertion in natural science can never exist absolutely proved, it could be refuted past the observation of a single counterexample. Such a counterexample would require that the assumptions underlying the theory that unsaid the impossibility be re-examined. Some philosophers, such as Sydney Shoemaker, have argued that the laws of nature are in fact necessary, not contingent; if then, then nomological possibility is equivalent to metaphysical possibility.[x] [11] [12]

The term supernatural is often used interchangeably with paranormal or preternatural—the latter typically limited to an adjective for describing abilities which announced to exceed what is possible within the boundaries of the laws of physics.[13] Epistemologically, the relationship betwixt the supernatural and the natural is indistinct in terms of natural phenomena that, ex hypothesi, violate the laws of nature, in so far as such laws are realistically accountable.

Parapsychologists use the term psi to refer to an assumed unitary forcefulness underlying the phenomena they study. Psi is divers in the Journal of Parapsychology as "personal factors or processes in nature which transcend accepted laws" (1948: 311) and "which are not-concrete in nature" (1962:310), and it is used to cover both extrasensory perception (ESP), an "awareness of or response to an external event or influence non apprehended by sensory means" (1962:309) or inferred from sensory knowledge, and psychokinesis (PK), "the straight influence exerted on a physical system by a subject without any known intermediate energy or instrumentation" (1945:305).[xiv]

—Michael Winkelman, Current Anthropology

Views on the "supernatural" vary, for example information technology may exist seen as:

  • indistinct from nature. From this perspective, some events occur co-ordinate to the laws of nature, and others occur according to a separate set of principles external to known nature. For example, in Scholasticism, it was believed that God was capable of performing whatever miracle so long as it didn't lead to a logical contradiction. Some religions posit immanent deities, nonetheless, and do not have a tradition analogous to the supernatural; some believe that everything anyone experiences occurs by the will (occasionalism), in the mind (neoplatonism), or as a part (nondualism) of a more fundamental divine reality (platonism).
  • incorrect homo attribution. In this view all events have natural and only natural causes. They believe that man beings accredit supernatural attributes to purely natural events, such every bit lightning, rainbows, floods, and the origin of life.[xv] [16]

Anthropological studies [edit]

Anthropological studies beyond cultures bespeak that people practise non agree or apply natural and supernatural explanations in a mutually sectional or dichotomous style. Instead, the reconciliation of natural and supernatural explanations is normal and pervasive across cultures.[17] Cross cultural studies indicate that there is coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations in both adults and children for explaining numerous things about the world such as disease, death, and origins.[18] [xix] Context and cultural input play a big role in determining when and how individuals incorporate natural and supernatural explanations.[xx] The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations in individuals may be the outcomes 2 distinct cerebral domains: one concerned with the physical-mechanical relations and another with social relations.[21] Studies on indigenous groups have immune for insights on how such coexistence of explanations may function.[22]

Supernatural concepts [edit]

Deity [edit]

A deity ( or )[23] is a supernatural beingness considered divine or sacred.[24] The Oxford Lexicon of English language defines deity every bit "a god or goddess (in a polytheistic religion)", or annihilation revered as divine.[25] C. Scott Littleton defines a deity as "a beingness with powers greater than those of ordinary humans, only who interacts with humans, positively or negatively, in ways that bear humans to new levels of consciousness, across the grounded preoccupations of ordinary life."[26] A male deity is a god, while a female deity is a goddess.

Religions tin be categorized by how many deities they worship. Monotheistic religions accept but ane deity (predominantly referred to equally God),[27] [28] polytheistic religions take multiple deities.[29] Henotheistic religions take i supreme deity without denying other deities, considering them every bit equivalent aspects of the same divine principle;[30] [31] and nontheistic religions deny whatever supreme eternal creator deity merely accept a pantheon of deities which live, die, and are reborn just like whatsoever other being.[32] : 35–37 [33] : 357–358

Diverse cultures have conceptualized a deity differently than a monotheistic God.[34] [35] A deity need not exist omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent or eternal,[34] [35] [36] The monotheistic God, withal, does have these attributes.[37] [38] [39] Monotheistic religions typically refer to God in masculine terms,[40] [41] : 96 while other religions refer to their deities in a diverseness of means – masculine, feminine, androgynous and gender neutral.[42] [43] [44]

Historically, many ancient cultures – such as Ancient India Aboriginal Egyptian, Ancient Greek, Aboriginal Roman, Nordic and Asian civilisation – personified natural phenomena, variously as either their conscious causes or simply their effects, respectively.[45] [46] [47] Some Avestan and Vedic deities were viewed equally ethical concepts.[45] [46] In Indian religions, deities take been envisioned as manifesting within the temple of every living being's torso, every bit sensory organs and mind.[48] [49] [fifty] Deities have also been envisioned as a form of being (Saṃsāra) after rebirth, for homo beings who gain merit through an ethical life, where they become guardian deities and live blissfully in sky, just are also subject to decease when their merit runs out.[32] : 35–38 [33] : 356–359

Affections [edit]

An angel is generally a supernatural being constitute in various religions and mythologies. In Abrahamic religions and Zoroastrianism, angels are often depicted as benevolent celestial beings who human activity as intermediaries between God or Sky and Earth.[51] [52] Other roles of angels include protecting and guiding homo beings, and carrying out God's tasks.[53] Within Abrahamic religions, angels are often organized into hierarchies, although such rankings may vary between sects in each religion, and are given specific names or titles, such equally Gabriel or "Destroying affections". The term "angel" has besides been expanded to various notions of spirits or figures found in other religious traditions. The theological report of angels is known every bit "angelology".

In art, angels are normally depicted as having the shape of human beings of boggling beauty;[54] [55] they are oftentimes identified using the symbols of bird wings,[56] halos,[57] and lite.

Prophecy [edit]

Prophecy involves a process in which letters are communicated past a god to a prophet. Such messages typically involve inspiration, interpretation, or revelation of divine volition concerning the prophet's social world and events to come up (compare divine knowledge). Prophecy is not express to any i culture. Information technology is a common holding to all known aboriginal societies effectually the world, some more than others. Many systems and rules well-nigh prophecy have been proposed over several millennia.

Revelation [edit]

In religion and theology, revelation is the revealing or disclosing of some form of truth or knowledge through advice with a deity or other supernatural entity or entities.

Some religions accept religious texts which they view as divinely or supernaturally revealed or inspired. For instance, Orthodox Jews, Christians and Muslims believe that the Torah was received from Yahweh on biblical Mount Sinai.[58] [59] Most Christians believe that both the Erstwhile Testament and the New Testament were inspired past God. Muslims believe the Quran was revealed by God to Muhammad give-and-take past word through the angel Gabriel (Jibril).[60] [61] In Hinduism, some Vedas are considered apauruṣeya , "not human compositions", and are supposed to have been directly revealed, and thus are chosen śruti, "what is heard". The 15,000 handwritten pages produced by the mystic Maria Valtorta were represented as straight dictations from Jesus, while she attributed The Book of Azariah to her guardian angel.[62] Aleister Crowley stated that The Book of the Police had been revealed to him through a higher beingness that called itself Aiwass.

A revelation communicated by a supernatural entity reported as being present during the event is chosen a vision. Straight conversations betwixt the recipient and the supernatural entity,[63] or concrete marks such every bit stigmata, accept been reported. In rare cases, such as that of Saint Juan Diego, physical artifacts accompany the revelation.[64] The Roman Catholic concept of interior locution includes just an inner voice heard past the recipient.

In the Abrahamic religions, the term is used to refer to the process by which God reveals noesis of himself, his volition, and his divine providence to the world of human beings.[65] In secondary usage, revelation refers to the resulting man knowledge about God, prophecy, and other divine things. Revelation from a supernatural source plays a less important role in some other religious traditions such as Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism.

Reincarnation [edit]

In Jainism, a soul travels to whatever 1 of the iv states of existence after death depending on its karmas.

Reincarnation is the philosophical or religious concept that an aspect of a living being starts a new life in a different physical torso or grade after each biological decease. It is likewise called rebirth or transmigration, and is a part of the Saṃsāra doctrine of cyclic existence.[66] [67] It is a central tenet of all major Indian religions, namely Jainism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism.[67] [68] [69] The idea of reincarnation is found in many ancient cultures,[seventy] and a conventionalities in rebirth/metempsychosis was held by Greek historic figures, such as Pythagoras, Socrates, and Plato.[71] It is as well a common belief of various ancient and modern religions such as Spiritism, Theosophy, and Eckankar, and as an esoteric belief in many streams of Orthodox Judaism. It is found equally well in many tribal societies around the world, in places such every bit Commonwealth of australia, East asia, Siberia, and South America.[72]

Although the bulk of denominations within Christianity and Islam do not believe that individuals reincarnate, detail groups within these religions practice refer to reincarnation; these groups include the mainstream historical and contemporary followers of Cathars, Alawites, the Druze,[73] and the Rosicrucians.[74] The historical relations between these sects and the beliefs near reincarnation that were characteristic of Neoplatonism, Orphism, Hermeticism, Manicheanism, and Gnosticism of the Roman era every bit well every bit the Indian religions have been the subject field of recent scholarly research.[75] Unity Church and its founder Charles Fillmore teaches reincarnation.

In recent decades, many Europeans and North Americans take adult an interest in reincarnation,[76] and many contemporary works mention it.

Karma [edit]

Karma (; Sanskrit: कर्म, romanized: karma , IPA: [ˈkɐɽmɐ] ( listen ); Pali: kamma) means action, work or deed;[77] information technology also refers to the spiritual principle of crusade and effect where intent and actions of an individual (cause) influence the future of that individual (result).[78] Good intent and expert deeds contribute to good karma and future happiness, while bad intent and bad deeds contribute to bad karma and future suffering.[79] [80]

With origins in ancient Republic of india'southward Vedic civilisation, the philosophy of karma is closely associated with the thought of rebirth in many schools of Indian religions (especially Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism[81]) as well as Taoism.[82] In these schools, karma in the present affects one's futurity in the electric current life, as well as the nature and quality of futurity lives – i's saṃsāra.[83] [84]

Christian theology [edit]

In Catholic theology, the supernatural social club is, co-ordinate to New Advent, divers equally "the ensemble of effects exceeding the powers of the created universe and gratuitously produced by God for the purpose of raising the rational fauna above its native sphere to a God-like life and destiny."[86] The Modern Cosmic Lexicon defines it as "the sum total of heavenly destiny and all the divinely established means of reaching that destiny, which surpass the mere powers and capacities of human nature."[87]

Process theology [edit]

Process theology is a school of idea influenced by the metaphysical process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947) and farther developed by Charles Hartshorne (1897–2000).

It is not possible, in procedure metaphysics, to conceive divine activity as a "supernatural" intervention into the "natural" order of events. Procedure theists ordinarily regard the distinction betwixt the supernatural and the natural as a by-production of the doctrine of creation ex nihilo. In process thought, there is no such thing equally a realm of the natural in dissimilarity to that which is supernatural. On the other paw, if "the natural" is defined more neutrally as "what is in the nature of things," then process metaphysics characterizes the natural as the creative activity of actual entities. In Whitehead's words, "It lies in the nature of things that the many enter into circuitous unity" (Whitehead 1978, 21). Information technology is tempting to emphasize procedure theism's denial of the supernatural and thereby highlight that the processed God cannot do in comparison what the traditional God could practice (that is, to bring something from nothing). In fairness, however, equal stress should exist placed on process theism'due south deprival of the natural (as traditionally conceived) so that one may highlight what the creatures cannot do, in traditional theism, in comparison to what they tin practice in process metaphysics (that is, to exist part creators of the world with God).[88]

—Donald Viney, "Process Theism" in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Heaven [edit]

Heaven, or the heavens, is a common religious, cosmological, or transcendent place where beings such as gods, angels, spirits, saints, or venerated ancestors are said to originate, be enthroned, or live. According to the behavior of some religions, heavenly beings can descend to Earth or incarnate, and earthly beings can ascend to sky in the afterlife, or in exceptional cases enter heaven live.

Heaven is often described as a "college place", the holiest place, a Paradise, in contrast to hell or the Underworld or the "low places", and universally or conditionally accessible by earthly beings according to diverse standards of divinity, goodness, piety, faith, or other virtues or right beliefs or only the volition of God. Some believe in the possibility of a heaven on Earth in a globe to come.

Another belief is in an axis mundi or earth tree which connects the heavens, the terrestrial earth, and the underworld. In Indian religions, sky is considered as Svarga loka,[89] and the soul is over again subjected to rebirth in unlike living forms co-ordinate to its karma. This cycle can be broken after a soul achieves Moksha or Nirvana. Any identify of existence, either of humans, souls or deities, exterior the tangible earth (Heaven, Hell, or other) is referred to as otherworld.

Underworld [edit]

The underworld is the supernatural globe of the dead in various religious traditions, located below the world of the living.[xc] Chthonic is the technical adjective for things of the underworld.

The concept of an underworld is found in almost every civilization and "may be every bit old as humanity itself".[91] Common features of underworld myths are accounts of living people making journeys to the underworld, often for some heroic purpose. Other myths reinforce traditions that entrance of souls to the underworld requires a proper observation of ceremony, such as the ancient Greek story of the recently dead Patroclus haunting Achilles until his torso could be properly buried for this purpose.[92] Persons having social status were dressed and equipped in order to meliorate navigate the underworld.[93]

A number of mythologies incorporate the concept of the soul of the deceased making its own journey to the underworld, with the expressionless needing to be taken across a defining obstruction such as a lake or a river to reach this destination.[94] Imagery of such journeys can be found in both aboriginal and modern art. The descent to the underworld has been described equally "the single most important myth for Modernist authors".[95]

Spirit [edit]

A spirit is a supernatural being, often only non exclusively a non-physical entity; such as a ghost, fairy, or angel.[96] The concepts of a person'southward spirit and soul, often also overlap, every bit both are either contrasted with or given ontological priority over the body and both are believed to survive bodily death in some religions,[97] and "spirit" can too have the sense of "ghost", i.e. a manifestation of the spirit of a deceased person. In English Bibles, "the Spirit" (with a capital "S"), specifically denotes the Holy Spirit.

Spirit is frequently used metaphysically to refer to the consciousness or personality.

Historically, it was too used to refer to a "subtle" as opposed to "gross" cloth substance, equally in the famous terminal paragraph of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica.[98]

Demon [edit]

A demon (from Koine Greek δαιμόνιον daimónion) is a supernatural and often malevolent existence prevalent in religion, occultism, literature, fiction, mythology and folklore.

In Ancient Nearly Eastern religions also as in the Abrahamic traditions, including aboriginal and medieval Christian demonology, a demon is considered a harmful spiritual entity, below the heavenly planes[99] which may cause demonic possession, calling for an exorcism. In Western occultism and Renaissance magic, which grew out of an amalgamation of Greco-Roman magic, Jewish Aggadah and Christian demonology,[100] a demon is believed to exist a spiritual entity that may exist conjured and controlled.

Magic [edit]

Magic or sorcery is the apply of rituals, symbols, deportment, gestures, or linguistic communication with the aim of utilizing supernatural forces.[101] [102] : 6–seven [103] [104] : 24 Belief in and practice of magic has been present since the earliest human cultures and continues to have an important spiritual, religious, and medicinal part in many cultures today. The term magic has a multifariousness of meanings, and at that place is no widely agreed upon definition of what information technology is.

Scholars of religion have defined magic in different ways. One approach, associated with the anthropologists Edward Tylor and James G. Frazer, suggests that magic and science are opposites. An culling approach, associated with the sociologists Marcel Mauss and Emile Durkheim, argues that magic takes place in individual, while religion is a communal and organised activity. Many scholars of faith have rejected the utility of the term magic and information technology has go increasingly unpopular within scholarship since the 1990s.

The term magic comes from the One-time Farsi magu, a word that applied to a form of religious functionary about which little is known. During the tardily sixth and early on fifth centuries BCE, this term was adopted into Ancient Greek, where it was used with negative connotations, to employ to religious rites that were regarded every bit fraudulent, unconventional, and dangerous. This meaning of the term was and then adopted by Latin in the commencement century BCE. The concept was so incorporated into Christian theology during the first century CE, where magic was associated with demons and thus divers confronting faith. This concept was pervasive throughout the Middle Ages, although in the early on modernistic period Italian humanists reinterpreted the term in a positive sense to establish the idea of natural magic. Both negative and positive understandings of the term were retained in Western culture over the following centuries, with the former largely influencing early academic usages of the word.

Throughout history, there have been examples of individuals who proficient magic and referred to themselves as magicians. This tendency has proliferated in the mod flow, with a growing number of magicians actualization within the esoteric milieu.[ non verified in body ] British esotericist Aleister Crowley described magic as the fine art of effecting change in accordance with will.

Divination [edit]

Divination (from Latin divinare "to foresee, to exist inspired by a god",[105] related to divinus, divine) is the attempt to proceeds insight into a question or state of affairs by way of an occultic, standardized process or ritual.[106] Used in diverse forms throughout history, diviners ascertain their interpretations of how a querent should proceed past reading signs, events, or omens, or through alleged contact with a supernatural agency.[107]

Divination can exist seen every bit a systematic method with which to organize what appear to be disjointed, random facets of existence such that they provide insight into a problem at manus. If a distinction is to be fabricated between divination and fortune-telling, divination has a more formal or ritualistic element and often contains a more social character, usually in a religious context, equally seen in traditional African medicine. Fortune-telling, on the other hand, is a more than everyday practice for personal purposes. Particular divination methods vary by culture and faith.

Divination is dismissed by the scientific community and skeptics as being superstition.[108] [109] In the 2nd century, Lucian devoted a witty essay to the career of a charlatan, "Alexander the false prophet", trained by "one of those who advertise enchantments, miraculous incantations, charms for your love-affairs, visitations for your enemies, disclosures of buried treasure, and successions to estates".[110]

Witchcraft [edit]

Witchcraft or witchery broadly ways the practice of and belief in magical skills and abilities exercised by alone practitioners and groups. Witchcraft is a broad term that varies culturally and societally, and thus can be hard to define with precision,[111] and cross-cultural assumptions about the meaning or significance of the term should be applied with circumspection. Witchcraft often occupies a religious divinatory or medicinal role,[112] and is often present inside societies and groups whose cultural framework includes a magical world view.[111]

Phenomenon [edit]

A phenomenon is an event not explicable by natural or scientific laws.[113] Such an event may exist attributed to a supernatural being (a deity), a miracle worker, a saint or a religious leader.

Informally, the word "phenomenon" is frequently used to characterise whatsoever beneficial event that is statistically unlikely but non contrary to the laws of nature, such as surviving a natural disaster, or only a "wonderful" occurrence, regardless of likelihood, such equally a birth. Other such miracles might be: survival of an illness diagnosed equally last, escaping a life-threatening state of affairs or 'beating the odds'. Some coincidences may be seen as miracles.[114]

A true miracle would, past definition, be a non-natural miracle, leading many rational and scientific thinkers to dismiss them as physically impossible (that is, requiring violation of established laws of physics within their domain of validity) or impossible to confirm past their nature (considering all possible physical mechanisms can never be ruled out). The sometime position is expressed for instance past Thomas Jefferson and the latter by David Hume. Theologians typically say that, with divine providence, God regularly works through nature yet, every bit a creator, is costless to work without, above, or against it likewise. The possibility and probability of miracles are and then equal to the possibility and probability of the being of God.[115]

Skepticism [edit]

Skepticism (American English) or scepticism (British English; see spelling differences) is more often than not any questioning attitude or incertitude towards one or more items of putative knowledge or conventionalities.[116] [117] It is often directed at domains such as the supernatural, morality (moral skepticism), religion (skepticism about the existence of God), or knowledge (skepticism about the possibility of knowledge, or of certainty).[118] Formally, skepticism as a topic occurs in the context of philosophy, specially epistemology, although it can exist applied to whatsoever topic such as politics, organized religion, and pseudoscience.

1 reason why skeptics assert that the supernatural cannot be is that annihilation "supernatural" is not a part of the natural world simply by definition. Although some believers in the supernatural insist that it merely cannot be demonstrated using the existing scientific methods, skeptics assert that such methods is the best tool humans take devised for knowing what is and isn't knowable.[119]

In fiction and popular culture [edit]

Supernatural entities and powers are common in diverse works of fantasy. Examples include the television shows Supernatural and The 10-Files, the magic of the Harry Potter series, The Lord of the Rings series, The Wheel of Fourth dimension serial, A Song of Ice and Fire series and the Force of Star Wars.

See also [edit]

  • Journal of Parapsychology
  • Liberal naturalism
  • Magical thinking
  • Parapsychology
  • Religious naturalism
  • Romanticism
  • Spirit photography

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Definition of SUPERNATURAL".
  2. ^ a b c d e f Bartlett, Robert (fourteen March 2008). "1. The Boundaries of the Supernatural". The Natural and the Supernatural in the Center Ages. Cambridge Academy Press. pp. 1–34. ISBN978-0521702553.
  3. ^ a b "Supernatural" (Online). A Concise Companion to the Jewish Religion. Oxford Reference Online – Oxford University Press. The ancients had no discussion for the supernatural any more than they had for nature.
  4. ^ Pasulka, Diana; Kripal, Jeffrey (23 November 2014). "Religion and the Paranormal". Oxford University Printing weblog. Oxford University Press.
  5. ^ Halman, Loek (2010). "eight. Disbelief And Secularity In The netherlands". In Phil Zuckerman (ed.). Atheism and Secularity Vol.2: Gloabal Expressions. Praeger. ISBN9780313351839. "Thus, despite the fact that they claim to be convinced atheists and the majority deny the existence of a personal god, a rather large minority of the Dutch convinced atheists believe in a supernatural power!" (e.g. telepathy, reincarnation, life after death, and heaven)
  6. ^ "Naturalism". Cyberspace Encyclopedia of Philosophy. University of Tennessee. However, naturalism is non always narrowly scientistic. At that place are versions of naturalism that repudiate supernaturalism and various types of a priori theorizing without exclusively championing the natural sciences.
  7. ^ a b "supernatural". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Printing. Retrieved 24 October 2018. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  8. ^ a b Saler, Benson (1977). "Supernatural every bit a Western Category". Ethos. v: 31–53. doi:ten.1525/eth.1977.5.1.02a00040.
  9. ^ Boyle, Robert; Stewart, Thou.A. (1991). Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle. HPC Classics Series. Hackett. pp. 176–177. ISBN978-0-87220-122-four. LCCN 91025480.
  10. ^ Roberts, John T. (2010). "Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 88 (3): 445–457. doi:10.1080/00048400903159016. S2CID 170608423.
  11. ^ "On the Metaphysical Contingency of Laws of Nature". Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. 2002. pp. 309–336.
  12. ^ "The Contingency of Physical Laws". Retrieved 2022-02-xi .
  13. ^ Partridge, Kenneth (2009). The paranormal. ISBN9780824210922 . Retrieved July 26, 2010.
  14. ^ Winkelman, M.; et al. (February 1982). "Magic: A Theoretical Reassessment [and Comments and Replies]". Current Anthropology. 23 (1): 37–66. doi:ten.1086/202778. JSTOR 274255. S2CID 147447041.
  15. ^ Zhong Yang Yan Jiu Yuan; Min Tsu Hsüeh Yen Chiu So (1976). Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Bug 42–44.
  16. ^ Ellis, B.J.; Bjorklund, D.F. (2004). Origins of the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Evolution. Guilford Publications. p. 413. ISBN9781593851033. LCCN 2004022693.
  17. ^ Legare, Cristine H.; Visala, Aku (2011). "Between Religion and Science: Integrating Psychological and Philosophical Accounts of Explanatory Coexistence". Human Development. 54 (3): 169–184. doi:x.1159/000329135. S2CID 53668380.
  18. ^ Legare, Cristine H.; Evans, E. Margaret; Rosengren, Karl Southward.; Harris, Paul L. (May 2012). "The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations Across Cultures and Evolution: Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations". Child Development. 83 (3): 779–793. doi:x.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x. hdl:2027.42/91141. PMID 22417318.
  19. ^ Aizenkot, Dana (eleven September 2020). "Meaning-Making to Child Loss: The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations of Death". Periodical of Constructivist Psychology. 35: 318–343. doi:ten.1080/10720537.2020.1819491. S2CID 225231409.
  20. ^ Busch, Justin T. A.; Watson-Jones, Rachel E.; Legare, Cristine H. (March 2017). "The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations within and across domains and development". British Periodical of Developmental Psychology. 35 (1): four–xx. doi:ten.1111/bjdp.12164. PMID 27785818. S2CID 24196030.
  21. ^ Whitehouse, Harvey (2011). "The Coexistence Problem in Psychology, Anthropology, and Evolutionary Theory". Man Evolution. 54 (3): 191–199. doi:10.1159/000329149. S2CID 145622566.
  22. ^ Watson-Jones, Rachel E.; Busch, Justin T. A.; Legare, Cristine H. (Oct 2015). "Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Explanatory Coexistence". Topics in Cognitive Science. vii (iv): 611–623. doi:ten.1111/tops.12162. PMID 26350158.
  23. ^ The American Heritage Book of English Usage: A Practical and Authoritative Guide to Contemporary English language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1996. p. 219. ISBN978-0395767856.
  24. ^ O'Brien, Jodi (2009). Encyclopedia of Gender and Guild. Los Angeles: SAGE. p. 191. ISBN9781412909167 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  25. ^ Stevenson, Angus (2010). Oxford Lexicon of English language (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 461. ISBN9780199571123 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  26. ^ Littleton], C. Scott (2005). Gods, Goddesses, and Mythology. New York: Marshall Cavendish. p. 378. ISBN9780761475590 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  27. ^ Becking, Bob; Dijkstra, Meindert; Korpel, Marjo; Vriezen, Karel (2001). Merely I God?: Monotheism in Aboriginal State of israel and the Veneration of the Goddess Asherah. London: New York. p. 189. ISBN9780567232120 . Retrieved June 28, 2017. The Christian tradition is, in imitation of Judaism, a monotheistic organized religion. This implies that believers accept the existence of only ane God. Other deities either practice not exist, are seen as the production of human being imagination or are dismissed equally remanents of a persistent paganism
  28. ^ Korte, Anne-Marie; Haardt, Maaike De (2009). The Boundaries of Monotheism: Interdisciplinary Explorations Into the Foundations of Western Monotheism. BRILL. p. 9. ISBN978-9004173163 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  29. ^ Brown, Jeannine K. (2007). Scripture every bit Communication: Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics. Baker Academic. p. 72. ISBN9780801027888 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  30. ^ Taliaferro, Charles; Harrison, Victoria Southward.; Goetz, Stewart (2012). The Routledge Companion to Theism. Routledge. pp. 78–79. ISBN9781136338236 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  31. ^ Reat, N. Ross; Perry, Edmund F. (1991). A World Theology: The Cardinal Spiritual Reality of Humankind . Cambridge University Press. pp. 73–75. ISBN9780521331593 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  32. ^ a b Keown, Damien (2013). Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction (New ed.). Oxford: Oxford Academy Press. ISBN9780199663835 . Retrieved June 22, 2017.
  33. ^ a b Bullivant, Stephen; Ruse, Michael (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Publishing. ISBN9780199644650 . Retrieved June 22, 2017.
  34. ^ a b Hood, Robert Eastward. (1990). Must God Remain Greek?: Afro Cultures and God-talk. Minneapolis: Fortress Printing. pp. 128–129. ISBN9780800624491. African people may describe their deities equally strong, but not omnipotent; wise but not all-seeing; old but non eternal; great but not omnipresent (...)
  35. ^ a b Trigger, Bruce G. (2003). Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Printing. pp. 441–442. ISBN9780521822459. [Historically...] people perceived far fewer differences between themselves and the gods than the adherents of modern monotheistic religions. Deities were not thought to be omniscient or omnipotent and were rarely believed to be invariable or eternal
  36. ^ John Murdoch, English Translations of Select Tracts, Published in Republic of india – Religious Texts at Google Books, pages 141–142; Quote: "Nosotros [monotheists] find by reason and revelation that God is all-seeing, omnipotent, most holy, etc, merely the Hindu deities possess none of those attributes. It is mentioned in their Shastras that their deities were all vanquished by the Asurs, while they fought in the heavens, and for fear of whom they left their abodes. This patently shows that they are not omnipotent."
  37. ^ Taliaferro, Charles; Marty, Elsa J. (2010). A Dictionary of Philosophy of Religion. New York: Continuum. pp. 98–99. ISBN9781441111975.
  38. ^ Wilkerson, Westward.D. (2014). Walking With The Gods. Sankofa. pp. 6–7. ISBN978-0991530014.
  39. ^ Trigger, Bruce 1000. (2003). Agreement Early Civilizations: A Comparative Report (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 473–474. ISBN9780521822459.
  40. ^ Kramarae, Cheris; Spender, Dale (2004). Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women'southward Bug and Knowledge. Routledge. p. 655. ISBN9781135963156 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  41. ^ O'Brien, Julia M. (2014). Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies. Oxford Academy Press, Incorporated. ISBN9780199836994 . Retrieved June 22, 2017.
  42. ^ Bonnefoy, Yves (1992). Roman and European Mythologies . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 274–275. ISBN9780226064550 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  43. ^ Pintchman, Tracy (2014). Seeking Mahadevi: Constructing the Identities of the Hindu Slap-up Goddess. SUNY Press. pp. one–two, 19–20. ISBN9780791490495 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  44. ^ Roberts, Nathaniel (2016). To Be Cared For: The Power of Conversion and Foreignness of Belonging in an Indian Slum. University of California Press. p. fifteen. ISBN9780520963634 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  45. ^ a b Malandra, William W. (1983). An Introduction to Ancient Iranian Religion: Readings from the Avesta and the Achaemenid Inscriptions. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. ix–10. ISBN978-0816611157 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  46. ^ a b Fløistad, Guttorm (2010). Book 10: Philosophy of Religion (1st ed.). Dordrecht: Springer Scientific discipline & Business Media B.V. pp. 19–20. ISBN9789048135271 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  47. ^ Daniel T. Potts (1997). Mesopotamian Civilization: The Fabric Foundations. Cornell University Press. pp. 186–187. ISBN978-0-8014-3339-ix.
  48. ^ Potter, Karl H. (2014). The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume 3: Advaita Vedanta up to Samkara and His Pupils. Princeton University Press. pp. 272–274. ISBN9781400856510 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  49. ^ Olivelle, Patrick (2006). The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 47. ISBN9780195361377 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  50. ^ Cush, Denise; Robinson, Catherine; York, Michael (2008). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. London: Routledge. pp. 899–900. ISBN9781135189792 . Retrieved June 28, 2017.
  51. ^ The Free Dictionary [1] retrieved 1 September 2012
  52. ^ "Angels in Christianity." Organized religion Facts. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Dec. 2014
  53. ^ [2]Augustine of Hippo'due south Enarrationes in Psalmos, 103, I, 15, augustinus.it (in Latin)
  54. ^ "Definition of ANGEL". www.merriam-webster.com . Retrieved 2016-05-02 .
  55. ^ "ANGELOLOGY - JewishEncyclopedia.com". jewishencyclopedia.com . Retrieved 2016-05-02 .
  56. ^ Proverbio(2007), pp. 90–95; cf. review in La Civiltà Cattolica, 3795–3796 (2–16 Baronial 2008), pp. 327–328.
  57. ^ Didron, Vol 2, pp.68–71
  58. ^ Beale G.K., The Book of Revelation, NIGTC, Grand Rapids – Cambridge 1999. = ISBN 0-8028-2174-X
  59. ^ Esposito, John L. What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam (New York: Oxford University Printing, 2002), pp. 7–8.
  60. ^ Lambert, Gray (2013). The Leaders Are Coming!. WestBow Printing. p. 287. ISBN9781449760137.
  61. ^ Roy H. Williams; Michael R. Drew (2012). Pendulum: How Past Generations Shape Our Present and Predict Our Future. Vanguard Press. p. 143. ISBN9781593157067.
  62. ^ Maria Valtorta, The Poem of the Man God, ISBN 99926-45-57-1
  63. ^ Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 0-87973-454-X p. 252
  64. ^ Michael Freze, 1989 They Bore the Wounds of Christ ISBN 0-87973-422-i
  65. ^ "Revelation | Ascertain Revelation at Dictionary.com". Dictionary.reference.com. Retrieved 2013-07-14 .
  66. ^ Norman C. McClelland 2010, pp. 24–29, 171. sfn error: no target: CITEREFNorman_C._McClelland2010 (help)
  67. ^ a b Mark Juergensmeyer & Wade Clark Roof 2011, pp. 271–272. sfn fault: no target: CITEREFMark_JuergensmeyerWade_Clark_Roof2011 (aid)
  68. ^ Stephen J. Laumakis 2008, pp. 90–99. sfn fault: no target: CITEREFStephen_J._Laumakis2008 (help)
  69. ^ Rita Yard. Gross (1993). Buddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism . State University of New York Press. pp. 148. ISBN978-ane-4384-0513-1.
  70. ^ Norman C. McClelland 2010, pp. 102–103. sfn error: no target: CITEREFNorman_C._McClelland2010 (assist)
  71. ^ run across Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, Philip L. Quinn, A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. John Wiley and Sons, 2010, folio 640, Google Books
  72. ^ Gananath Obeyesekere, Imagining Karma: Ethical Transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek Rebirth. University of California Press, 2002, page 15.
  73. ^ Hitti, Philip K (2007) [1924]. Origins of the Druze People and Religion, with Extracts from their Sacred Writings (New Edition). Columbia University Oriental Studies. 28. London: Saqi. pp. xiii–14. ISBN 0-86356-690-1
  74. ^ Heindel, Max (1985) [1939, 1908] The Rosicrucian Christianity Lectures (Collected Works): The Riddle of Life and Expiry. Oceanside, California. fourth edition. ISBN 0-911274-84-7
  75. ^ An important recent work discussing the common influence of ancient Greek and Indian philosophy regarding these matters is The Shape of Ancient Thought past Thomas McEvilley
  76. ^ "Popular psychology, conventionalities in life later death and reincarnation in the Nordic countries, Western and Eastern Europe" (PDF). (54.8 KB)
  77. ^ Run across:
    • Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 15, New York, pp 679–680, Article on Karma; Quote – "Karma pregnant act or action; in addition, it too has philosophical and technical meaning, cogent a person's deeds as determining his hereafter lot."
    • The Encyclopedia of World Religions, Robert Ellwood & Gregory Alles, ISBN 978-0-8160-6141-9, pp 253; Quote – "Karma: Sanskrit word pregnant action and the consequences of action."
    • Hans Torwesten (1994), Vedanta: Heart of Hinduism, ISBN 978-0802132628, Grove Press New York, pp 97; Quote – "In the Vedas the word karma (work, deed or action, and its resulting event) referred mainly to..."
  78. ^ Karma Encyclopædia Britannica (2012)
  79. ^ Halbfass, Wilhelm (2000), Karma und Wiedergeburt im indischen Denken, Diederichs, München, Germany
  80. ^ Lawrence C. Becker & Charlotte B. Becker, Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition, ISBN 0-415-93672-ane, Hindu Ideals, pp 678
  81. ^ Parvesh Singla. The Manual of Life – Karma. Parvesh singla. pp. 5–7. GGKEY:0XFSARN29ZZ. Retrieved iv June 2011.
  82. ^ Eva Wong, Taoism, Shambhala Publications, ISBN 978-1590308820, pp. 193
  83. ^ "Karma" in: John Bowker (1997), The Concise Oxford Lexicon of Earth Religions, Oxford Academy Printing.
  84. ^ James Lochtefeld (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Rosen Publishing, New York, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1, pp 351–352
  85. ^ Pastrovicchi, Angelo (1918). Rev. Francis S. Laing (ed.). St. Joseph of Copertino. St. Louis: B.Herder. p. 4. ISBN978-0-89555-135-1.
  86. ^ Sollier, J. "Supernatural Lodge". Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 2008-09-eleven .
  87. ^ Hardon, Fr. John. "Supernatural Order". Eternal Life. Retrieved 2008-09-15 .
  88. ^ Viney, Donald (2008). "Process Theism". In Edward Due north. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Wintertime 2008 ed.).
  89. ^ "Life After Expiry Revealed – What Really Happens in the Afterlife". SSRF English . Retrieved 2018-03-22 .
  90. ^ "Underworld". The free dictionary . Retrieved one July 2010.
  91. ^ Isabelle Loring Wallace, Jennie Hirsh, Contemporary Art and Classical Myth (2011), p. 295.
  92. ^ Radcliffe G. Edmonds, Iii, Myths of the Underworld Journeying: Plato, Aristophanes, and the 'Orphic' Gilt Tablets (2004), p. 9.
  93. ^ Jon Mills, Underworlds: Philosophies of the Unconscious from Psychoanalysis to Metaphysics (2014), p. 1.
  94. ^ Evans Lansing Smith, The Descent to the Underworld in Literature, Painting, and Moving-picture show, 1895–1950 (2001), p. 257.
  95. ^ Evans Lansing Smith, The Descent to the Underworld in Literature, Painting, and Film, 1895–1950 (2001), p. 7.
  96. ^ François 2008, p.187-197.
  97. ^ OED "spirit 2.a.: The soul of a person, as commended to God, or passing out of the body, in the moment of death."
  98. ^ Burtt, Edwin A. (2003). Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. p. 275.
  99. ^ S. T. Joshi Icons of Horror and the Supernatural: An Encyclopedia of Our Worst Nightmares, Band Greenwood Publishing Group 2007 ISBN 978-0-313-33781-ix page 34
  100. ^ Meet, for example, the form synopsis and bibliography for "Magic, Science, Religion: The Evolution of the Western Esoteric Traditions" Archived November 29, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, at Primal European University, Budapest
  101. ^ Hutton, Ronald (1995). The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles: Their Nature and Legacy (Reprint ed.). Oxford; Cambridge: Blackwell. pp. 289–291, 335. ISBN978-0631189466.
  102. ^ Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja (1991). Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality (Reprint ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Press. ISBN978-0521376310.
  103. ^ Hanegraaff, Wouter J. (2006). Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism (Unabridged ed.). Leiden: Brill. p. 718. ISBN978-9004152311.
  104. ^ Mauss, Marcel; Bain, Robert; Pocock, D. F. (2007). A General Theory of Magic (Reprint ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN978-0415253963.
  105. ^ "LacusCurtius • Greek and Roman Divination (Smith'due south Dictionary, 1875)". uchicago.edu.
  106. ^ Peek, P.M. African Divination Systems: Means of Knowing. page 2. Indiana University Press. 1991.
  107. ^ Silva, Sónia (2016). "Object and Objectivity in Divination". Fabric Religion. 12 (4): 507–509. doi:x.1080/17432200.2016.1227638. ISSN 1743-2200. S2CID 73665747.
  108. ^ Yau, Julianna. (2002). Witchcraft and Magic. In Michael Shermer. The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. pp. 278–282. ISBN 1-57607-654-7
  109. ^ Regal, Brian. (2009). Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia. Greenwood. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-313-35507-3
  110. ^ "Lucian of Samosata : Alexander the Fake Prophet". tertullian.org.
  111. ^ a b Witchcraft in the Middle Ages, Jeffrey Russell, p.4-10.
  112. ^ Bengt Ankarloo & Stuart Clark, Witchcraft and Magic in Europe: Biblical and Pagan Societies", Academy of Philadelphia Press, 2001
  113. ^ Phenomenon
  114. ^ Halbersam, Yitta (1890). Small-scale Miracles. Adams Media Corp. ISBN978-1-55850-646-6.
  115. ^ Miracles on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  116. ^ Popkin, R. H. "The History of Skepticism from Erasmus to Descartes (rev. ed. 1968); C. Fifty. Stough, Greek Skepticism (1969); M. Burnyeat, ed., The Skeptical Tradition (1983); B. Stroud, The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism (1984)". Encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com.
  117. ^ "Philosophical views are typically classed every bit skeptical when they involve advancing some caste of doubt regarding claims that are elsewhere taken for granted." utm.edu
  118. ^ Greco, John (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Printing, US. ISBN9780195183214.
  119. ^ Novella, Steven, et al. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a Globe Increasingly Full of Faux. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. pp. 145–146.

Further reading [edit]

  • Economic Production and the Spread of Supernatural Beliefs ~ Daniel Araújo January 7, 2022
  • Bouvet R, Bonnefon J. F. (2015). "Non-Cogitating Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 41 (vii): 955–61. doi:ten.1177/0146167215585728. PMID 25948700. S2CID 33570482.
  • McNamara P, Bulkeley 1000 (2015). "Dreams as a Source of Supernatural Agent Concepts". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 283. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00283. PMC4365543. PMID 25852602.
  • Riekki T, Lindeman M, Raij T. T. (2014). "Supernatural Believers Attribute More Intentions to Random Move than Skeptics: An fMRI Study". Social Neuroscience. 9 (4): 400–411. doi:x.1080/17470919.2014.906366. PMID 24720663. S2CID 33940568. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Purzycki Benjamin G (2013). "The Minds of Gods: A Comparative Study of Supernatural Agency". Cognition. 129 (1): 163–179. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.010. PMID 23891826. S2CID 23554738.
  • Thomson P, Jaque S. Five. (2014). "Unresolved Mourning, Supernatural Beliefs and Dissociation: A Mediation Assay". Zipper and Human Development. 16 (5): 499–514. doi:10.1080/14616734.2014.926945. PMID 24913392. S2CID 10290610.
  • Vail Grand. Due east, Arndt J, Addollahi A. (2012). "Exploring the Existential Function of Religion and Supernatural Agent Behavior Among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 38 (x): 1288–1300. doi:10.1177/0146167212449361. PMID 22700240. S2CID 2019266. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors listing (link)

lyonuponed.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural

Postar um comentário for "Early Christian Art Rejected Natural Space to Suggest the Supernatural"